Should Chelski be folded by FIFA and no longer exist as a football club?

these are just some of the reasons why i think it should be considered -





http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football...





http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football...





http://soccernet.espn.go.com/news/story?...





http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/sport/f...





http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/main.jh...





http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,20023...

Should Chelski be folded by FIFA and no longer exist as a football club?
even though i aint looked at the http's yeah fold em up and ship em somewhere far far away
Reply:yes





i h8 chelski
Reply:They should have to balance their books for one thing like all businesses have to do, without being bailed out by their shady sugar daddy. As for tapping up, if clubs got point deductions instead of fines that practise would soon stop, why did Man u except compensation for Mikel instead of taking it further the same goes for Spurs with Arnesen, the answer money , they both sold out.
Reply:Don't be silly
Reply:I don't think they have done any worse than other clubs, if you take a long term view. If you trawl back through history you can find dirt on most clubs. As for Ken Bates, his abrasive management style was a major factor in the delays in the early phases of the new Wembly project - major figures simply wanted nothing to do with him when they could make the same amount of money elsewhere without the aggravation. I am not inclined to listen to his protestations.
Reply:whats chelski .... never heard of it . it does not exist already m8
Reply:Should this lemon be destroyed by god (or whatever it is)?





this question he asked is the reason why i think this should be considered...
Reply:that wud be like attempting to take the alcohol content out of ur bevvy-silly
Reply:no they are a perfectly decent club and FIFA should rather suspend other clubs that do other things such as match fix, not chelsea who dont do much wrong.